October 25
Fixed-Term vs. Interim Contracts: Choosing the Right Option
Industry Insights
Emily Crisp
In recent years, the way people work within the legal sector has undergone a major transformation. Whether it’s the systems used, or how firms structure their talent acquisition strategy, it’s clear that the traditional legal industry has evolved and adapted to thrive in the modern age. But what do these changes look like? And how do you choose the right option for your legal team?
The introduction of temporary legal professionals
The introduction of temporary workers is a key example of a notable change to the way in which legal professionals conduct their work. This gives law firms the ability to scale their legal teams up and down to cater to fluctuating demands and workload; and in turn reduces their permanent headcount, whilst still allowing legal teams to take on the same, if not more, work.It is important to note that many contract workers will often select this way of working as a lifestyle choice, as opposed to the common misconception that they are unable to find permanent work. Contract work can offer a large amount of flexibility, whether it provides increased control over working patterns, a greater variety of work, or allowing you to balance work around other life commitments, it can be a fantastic option for legal professionals looking to take back control of their career and put the life back into work-life balance.
So, what types of contracts are out there? Well, generally it boils down to two options: fixed-term and interim. Both are good offerings in their own right, but each has their own distinctive pros and cons. Choosing the option which works for you as a business must be decided according to the needs of your legal team at the time.
What is a fixed-term contract?
A fixed-term contract is an employment agreement with a set duration. It offers the same rights as permanent contracts, like paid leave, but ends once the term or project concludes. Employers may renew or terminate it at the end. If a business uses a recruiter to find a candidate for this fixed-term contract, they will pay a finder’s fee to an agency, which will be a percentage of their annual salary (generally pro rata for contracts less than 12 months).What is an interim contract?
An interim contract is a short-term contract, often used to fill an immediate need. Candidates will be paid either on an hourly or day rate, and will have a shorter notice period. The candidate will likely have come through an agency and be on their payroll. While interim contracts are typically shorter-term, contractors can often find themselves working within businesses for longer extended periods.You will pay the agency a daily, or hourly rate, and this will include: the candidate rate, employment costs (pension, holiday pay, apprenticeship levy, NI) and agency margin. On occasion, candidates will also work via their own limited company. This can be organised independently between the business and the contractor, with the business paying the candidate directly, or via an agency. In this case, it is the contractor’s responsibility to pay the relevant employment costs.
So, what are the pros/cons of the two methods?
Typically, fixed-term contracts tend to be longer, as they cover a set period with a defined end date, and generally carry a longer notice period; with standard practice being four weeks. This makes fixed-term contracts less suitable for shorter projects, especially those under six months. If you’re a little unsure on project timelines and how long the project may take, you might find yourself guessing deadlines and potentially over-resourcing.With an interim consultant, you only need to give one to two weeks' notice. They are well aware that the contract might wrap up early if their work is no longer needed, keeping things flexible and hassle-free. This can make it easier to scale up and down. For instance, if you require lawyers for a document review exercise, and you think that it will roughly take five weeks from your estimation, but they complete the review in two, you can provide a short notice and quickly scale the resource down again. This is not something you can do with a fixed-term contract, and provides a completely flexible way to boost your legal team as and when needed.
An interim consultant also might be more cost-effective for shorter periods, as their flexibility allows the firm to avoid long-term contracts or benefits typically associated with permanent or fixed-term hires. Since the rate you pay - whether hourly or daily - includes all employment costs, there are no hidden surprises. Everything’s laid out upfront, making it much easier to manage your budget month-by-month.
One of the distinctive differences between a fixed-term and interim contract is that when it comes to the former, it is the employer’s responsibility to payroll the candidate. A candidate coming onto a fixed-term contract with the business for all intents and purposes will be a permanent employee for their contract period. This can mean additional work for the business in terms of onboarding, and offers slightly less flexibility if an earlier termination is required. Keep in mind that, on top of the candidate’s salary, you’ll need to cover additional employment costs, plus the finder’s fee you paid to bring them onboard. This can mean that there are some hidden costs that many businesses won’t initially consider. That being said, if you are savvy and factor in all of the above, you can have a good idea of the fixed cost for a longer set period of time.
Interim contractors will likely be provided by an agency, and therefore they will manage the payroll for that candidate. This can take out a lot of the aggravation of onboarding/offboarding and mean that the agency can assist with performance management, timesheets, payment and many other areas. An interim contract can be beneficial when you are looking to onboard someone quickly, as often these candidates will have already been vetted by the agency and can start work in as little as 24 hours!
Which is better: fixed term or interim contract?
Certainly, there are benefits to either model and both work effectively as a way to increase your team’s headcount on a temporary basis. It is important to pick the right model for you, and you may even need to adjust it on a case-by-case basis.Either way, the introduction of temporary contractors has brought in an increased element of flexibility for firms, so that they no longer have to commit to a larger permanent headcount that could potentially be underutilised at different points in the year (particularly in practice areas that tend to have lumpy work). It’s always beneficial for firms to think about their resourcing strategy and whether there are more efficient ways of working that you could implement.
If you want to have a chat regarding the recruitment and resourcing strategy for your firm, or what models might work for you and your team, please do reach out to me on emily.crisp@f-lex.co.uk and I would love to have a chat and provide you with some advice.